Judge Surrick rules on October 24, 2008 to dismiss the case filed by Philip J. Berg in Philadelphia District Court concerning Barack Obama’s birth records and his eligibility to serve as President of the United States if elected.
The actual document is on Justia.
http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/pennsylvania/paedce/2:2008cv04083/281573/28/
Interesting interpretation of the first conclusion… ” Berg lacked standing to bring the suit because he did not face direct harm even if the allegations were true” This is posted on the University of Pennsylvania School of Law website by Devin Montgomery. He notes that Berg plans to appeal.
http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2008/10/federal-judge-dismisses-obama.php
I heard about all this when Berg was interviewed on the SavageNation with Michael Savage (Weiner).
Here is the Savage interview. http://michaelsavage.wnd.com/?pageId=2256
So it doesn’t seem as if this got a fair shake and was dumped on a technicality and not on the evidence…
If any lawyer types come across this posting… Please sound off. If an actual assessment of the evidence was derailed on a technicality… Justice? Really?
And the US Constitution…
http://www.house.gov/house/Constitution/Constitution.html
Article II, Section 1, Clause 5
“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”
.
_________________________________________________
Thanks for checking out my posting. Check out the latest at https://mrobvious.wordpress.com
No scraping please….
_________________________________________________
Miscellaneous 